Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is actionable and well-structured for a single-purpose read tool, with executable commands and complete schemas. Its main weaknesses are repeated path-syntax/field descriptions and large inlined JSON schemas that would benefit from externalization.
Suggestions
Move the full input and output JSON schemas into a separate references/ file and link to it, keeping only essential field notes inline.
De-duplicate the path syntax and field descriptions (currently restated in the body, input table, and schema).
Add one worked example with a concrete objectRef and a small paths/viewQuery payload to cover the common case.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient prose, but the path syntax and field descriptions are repeated across the body, input table, and inlined JSON schema, and the large input/output schemas are inlined rather than externalized. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides an executable CLI command, concrete path syntax, stdin/file variants, and full JSON schemas for input and output; only minor gaps (no worked example with a real objectRef). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-step read tool with an unambiguous call; no destructive/batch loop is required so the simple-skill exception applies, though no validation guidance for verifying partial reads is given. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body has section structure but inlines the full input and output JSON schemas, which would fit better in a separate reference file; no bundle files exist to externalize detail. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |