Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and immediately actionable, with executable CLI examples, a clear input table, and explicit output shape. Weaknesses are redundancy (path syntax stated three times) and two large inlined JSON schemas that inflate the token cost and belong in a references file.
Suggestions
State the path syntax once (in the "## Path syntax" section) and have the `paths` table row and ViewQuery description reference it instead of repeating it.
Move the full Input and Output JSON schemas to a references/ file (e.g. references/schema.md) and keep only a compact summary of key members inline.
Fix the "How to Call" example to show a valid objectRef payload, e.g. {"objectRef": {"instanceID": 12345}, "paths": ["health"]}, instead of the placeholder string_value that contradicts the schema.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient prose with no conceptual padding, but path syntax is explained three times ("## Path syntax", the `paths` table row, and `ViewQuery.Path`'s schema description) and two ~60-line JSON schemas are inlined wholesale. Not 4 because the schema dumps and triple-stated path syntax are unnecessary bulk that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Executable CLI commands with three invocation patterns (inline JSON, --input-file, stdin heredoc) plus a troubleshooting section for CLI-not-found. Not 5 because the sample input shows "objectRef": "string_value" while the schema requires an object with an integer instanceID — a copy-paste user would construct the wrong payload. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Single-purpose read skill: the one action (call object-get-data with objectRef and optional paths/viewQuery) is unambiguous, with full call syntax, input requirements, output schema, and error recovery. It is a read operation, so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but the bundle contains no references directory and ~120 lines of JSON Schema API reference are inlined in SKILL.md — material that clearly belongs in a separate reference file. Not 4 because reference content is inline rather than split out with signaled navigation. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |