Content
56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a concrete CLI invocation and troubleshooting, but it is padded with duplication — the description restated as prose, inputs documented twice, and a bulky inline output schema. Consolidating the input sections and trimming the intro would materially tighten it.
Suggestions
Delete the opening paragraph that restates the frontmatter description, and remove the duplicate 'Inputs' section (keep the more detailed 'Input' table, or vice versa).
Replace placeholder values in the 'How to Call' example with a realistic invocation, e.g. "query": "textmesh", "maxResults": 10.
Trim or collapse the ~90-line Output JSON Schema to the essential fields already summarized in 'Result composition', or move it to a reference file to shorten the main body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Noticeably verbose through duplication: the intro paragraph repeats the frontmatter description almost verbatim, offlineMode semantics are explained twice (the 'Inputs' bullets and again in the 'Input' table), and the ~90-line Output JSON Schema largely restates 'Result composition'. Not 1: no padding with concepts Claude already knows; not 3: the redundancy is pervasive rather than occasional. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable commands ('unity-mcp-cli run-tool package-search --input ...' plus --input-file and stdin variants) with a troubleshooting fallback for a missing CLI. Not 5: the example uses placeholders ('query': 'string_value', 'maxResults': 0 — which would return zero results if run literally) instead of a realistic, copy-paste-ready invocation. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a single-task skill the one action — call package-search with a query — is unambiguous, with error-recovery guidance for a missing CLI; read-only search, so no validation cap applies. Not 5: the duplicated 'Inputs' and 'Input' sections and the 'maxResults': 0 example create minor ambiguity about defaults. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Headers provide some structure, but the inline ~90-line Output JSON Schema and the duplicated Inputs/Input sections are content that should be split out or consolidated; no bundle files exist to offload to. Not 4: content placement is not 'mostly appropriate' given the redundancy. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |