Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-organized and gives executable CLI examples, but it redundantly documents the input three times and carries generic CLI boilerplate. As a destructive batch tool it documents the tool's internal validation yet offers no workflow checkpoints or failure-handling guidance for the caller, capping workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Collapse the triple input documentation (## Inputs, ## Input table, ### Input JSON Schema) into one section, keeping only the table plus the sample path.
Add caller-side verification steps for the destructive operation, e.g. confirm paths via script-read before calling, and what to do if deletion or the post-delete compilation fails.
Replace the placeholder `"files": "string_value"` with a real array example such as `{"files": ["Assets/Scripts/MyScript.cs"]}` so the main snippet is copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The same input is documented three times (## Inputs prose, ## Input table, ### Input JSON Schema) and generic CLI boilerplate (npx/npm troubleshooting, heredoc/stdin tips) pads the file. Mostly efficient and action-focused, but noticeably could be tightened — matching the 3 anchor rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-pasteable `unity-mcp-cli run-tool script-delete` commands with `--input`, `--input-file`, and stdin variants, plus a real sample path in the Input table. Minor gap: the primary example uses the placeholder `"files": "string_value"` instead of an actual array value, so it's mostly-but-not-fully executable guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Behavior section states the tool "Validates the array (non-empty, every entry ends with `.cs`, every entry exists)" and recommends reading files first via script-read, but this is a destructive batch operation with no explicit workflow checkpoints, no post-delete verification, and no feedback loop for deletion or compilation failure — the destructive/batch cap of 3 applies. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single file has no bundle references and is cleanly sectioned (Inputs, Behavior, How to Call, Troubleshooting, Output). However, the generic CLI-invocation boilerplate (stdin/heredoc patterns, npm/npx troubleshooting) that would be shared across sibling tools is inlined, and the file runs past the 'under 50 lines' simple-skill case — good structure with minor organization gaps, matching the 4 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |