claude_skills

Same reverse-thinking method as dh:rt-ica (see dh:rt-ica or dh-glossary for the definition), but localizes any MISSING input to the affected task only, as a non-blocking information-completeness pre-pass before task decomposition and plan generation. Use when grooming backlog items, generating plans, decomposing tasks under uncertainty, or working in brownfield and refactor scenarios. Produces completeness summary (APPROVED-FOR-PLANNING, APPROVED-WITH-GAPS, or BLOCKED-FOR-PLANNING), missing input report with dependency mapping, required unblock actions, and planning annotations for downstream tasks. Use dh:rt-ica instead at the S2 implementation gate where missing inputs must halt execution.

Transforms validated /linear-walkthrough artifacts into one presentation-ready deck outline per major codebase component. Use when the user asks to create a presentation, prepare a walkthrough deck, build an onboarding deck, produce an architecture review deck, or summarize a codebase for a technical audience. Requires walkthrough directory output -- reads unified walkthrough, per-section files, validation reports, coverage maps, entry points, and open questions -- then orchestrates four parallel agent phases to produce slide outlines with speaker notes, evidence references, and suggested visuals.

Badge design and selection knowledge base for shields.io badges in README files. Use when writing or updating READMEs, choosing badge layouts, selecting badge styles, adding project health indicators, or picking Simple Icons logo slugs. Covers shields.io URL encoding rules, static vs dynamic badge selection, style variants (flat/flat-square/for-the-badge/social/plastic), layout patterns (two-tier/inline/centered), project-type badge sets for Python/JS/Rust/Claude plugins, color reference, non-obvious logo slugs, and common anti-patterns to avoid.

Start a local Git rebase when the user explicitly requests replay of a named source ref, or of the current branch, onto a named target, including a rebase-then-push request, which carries exact-lease publication to the branch's own remote destination, or continue or abort an active rebase. Use only when local history replay will start or is active; do not use for merge-based branch updates, repository merge settings, pull-request or merge-request merging, or push-only requests.

Assess and address review feedback on GitHub PRs, GitLab MRs, or in conversation. Use when checking new reviews, responding to comments, rechecking after a push, or following up on approvals and change requests.

Bulk-refresh research entries in ./research/ using parallel research-curator agents. Use when /refresh-research is invoked, stale research needs updating, or bulk re-verification of research entries is requested. Inventories entries by review date and age, runs RT-ICA pre-flight, spawns agents in waves of 5, then validates, reviews, and commits through research-curator. Supports --all, --stale, --category, --layer, and --dry-run flags.

Orchestrate research entry lifecycle in ./research/ — create, batch-import, refresh stale entries, and validate structure. Use when asked to add a tool, research a URL, document a library, refresh research, validate entries, or given any tool or library URL. Supports --batch (parallel multi-URL), --rerun (refresh one or all entries), and --validate (structural check with auto-fix of error-severity issues).

Ensemble SOLID review — fans the ruleset across overlapping focused workers over the same code, then reduces by corroboration.

Single-pass SOLID review — dispatches one reviewer over the complete ruleset, emitting the fixed candidate schema.

Look up prior Claude Code sessions when context is lost or forgotten. Use when asked what was done before, what happened in the last session, or any request to recall past conversation history, prior decisions, experiments, or outcomes. Indexes and searches raw JSONL transcripts from ~/.claude/projects/ via DuckDB. Returns verbatim user messages, summarizes AI actions and sub-agent outcomes, detects tool errors and user frustration signals, and reports tool usage statistics. Summaries cached at ~/.claude/kaizen/session-summaries/.

Walks a user from one rough content idea to a finished post, platform-adapted variants, and repurposed follow-on assets using a 7-step sequential prompting workflow. Use when the user wants to turn a half-formed idea, frustration, story, or client situation into publishable content quickly and consistently — covering idea extraction, hook generation, outline, draft, humanizer pass, platform adaptation (LinkedIn, Reddit, X/Twitter, newsletter, Telegram), and repurpose engine.

Builds a skill from official documentation through categorized research, citation review, integration, and final validation. Use when researching a tool or library before creating a skill, when "research for skill" or "create comprehensive skill" is requested, or when extensive multi-source documentation gathering is needed.

Transitions a GitHub milestone from planning to active execution. Use when the team is ready to begin a sprint or release cycle — bulk-transitions open issue labels from status:needs-grooming to status:in-progress, updates GitHub Projects V2 Status to In Progress, and confirms before applying changes. Requires milestone number as argument. Use after /group-items-to-milestone.

Research a specific technology, library, system, protocol, or tool to answer a concrete technical question with source-traceable evidence. Use when current implementation details, version behavior, configuration, compatibility, or authoritative technical facts must be verified rather than recalled. Also use when explicitly asked to incorporate verified findings into an existing skill.

Creative reasoning framework for ill-defined problems where conventional solutions are suboptimal. Use when the problem has ambiguous goals, vast solution space, no single correct answer, or requires innovation. Implements three paradigms — combinational (novel combinations of familiar ideas), exploratory (expand solution space boundaries), transformative (alter fundamental constraints). Do not use for well-defined problems, mathematical puzzles, or tasks requiring convergent reasoning.

Use when the user asks what to do next, asks for a plan under uncertainty, challenges stalled or low-trust work, requests multiple possible approaches before action, or needs an evidence-first loop that uses RT-ICA-style prerequisite checks, adversarial review, subagent coordination, real validation, and durable concern tracking.

Use this skill when reviewing, designing, or improving a workshop, lesson, training session, facilitation plan, talk, or educational explanation. Use it when the user provides a topic, concept, or explanation and wants better framing questions, curiosity hooks, opening prompts, discussion questions, learner reflection prompts, or ways to make participants think before being taught.