Domain-Driven Design

"The heart of software is its ability to solve domain-related problems for its user." — Eric Evans

TL;DR

Models complex business domains using DDD strategic and tactical patterns — bounded contexts, aggregates, entities, value objects, domain events, and ubiquitous language. Use this skill when tackling complex business logic, designing microservice boundaries, or when the team and domain experts speak different languages. [EXPLICIT]

Procedure

Step 1: Discover

• Conduct domain exploration through event storming or domain storytelling sessions
• Identify key business processes, actors, and domain terminology
• Search the codebase for existing domain models, entities, and naming conventions

Step 2: Analyze

• Define bounded contexts by identifying linguistic boundaries (same word, different meaning)
• Map context relationships using a Context Map (upstream/downstream, conformist, ACL, shared kernel)
• Identify aggregates by grouping entities that share transactional consistency boundaries
• Extract domain events that represent meaningful state transitions

Step 3: Execute

• Document the ubiquitous language glossary with precise definitions
• Design aggregate roots with invariant enforcement and consistency boundaries
• Define domain events with clear schemas and publish/subscribe contracts
• Create value objects for concepts defined by attributes rather than identity
• Map bounded context integration patterns (ACL, Published Language, Open Host)

Step 4: Validate

• Verify aggregate boundaries enforce all business invariants
• Confirm ubiquitous language is used consistently in code, tests, and documentation
• Check that bounded contexts have clear ownership and integration contracts
• Validate domain events capture all meaningful state transitions

Quality Criteria

• Bounded contexts have explicit boundaries and documented relationships
• Aggregates enforce consistency invariants within their boundary
• Ubiquitous language glossary exists and matches code naming
• Domain events are named in past tense and carry sufficient data
• Evidence tags applied to all claims

Anti-Patterns

• Anemic domain model: entities with only getters/setters and no behavior
• God aggregate: single aggregate that encompasses the entire domain
• Leaking bounded context: sharing internal models across context boundaries

Related Skills

• event-architecture — implements domain events technically
• system-architecture — bounded contexts inform service decomposition
• flow-mapping — visualizes the business processes DDD models

Usage

Example invocations:

• "/domain-driven-design" — Run the full domain driven design workflow
• "domain driven design on this project" — Apply to current context

Assumptions & Limits

• Assumes access to project artifacts (code, docs, configs) [EXPLICIT]
• Requires English-language output unless otherwise specified [EXPLICIT]
• Does not replace domain expert judgment for final decisions [EXPLICIT]

Edge Cases

Packet

Capas del packet, cargables bajo demanda (disciplina ICM: una capa por vez, nunca todas juntas): knowledge/ cuerpo de conocimiento · prompts/ prompts listos · examples/ salida de ejemplo · agents/ subagentes del packet · templates/ plantilla de output.