Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-bounded stage contract that correctly pushes depth to a real, high-quality playbook — but it defers all executable guidance to that reference, keeps validation abstract, and its generated Packet block describes a bundle structure that doesn't match what's on disk. Aligning the body's procedure with the scripts that actually ship would close the main gaps.
Suggestions
Inline the key commands into the Procedure (e.g. `python3 scripts/scaffold_hook.py --event <E> --type <command>` and `python3 scripts/validate_hook.py <file>`) so the body is actionable without opening the playbook.
Make the validation step executable: replace "Validate against the Quality Criteria" with a concrete gate — `python3 scripts/validate_hook.py <file>` and `bash scripts/check.sh` must both be green — plus a fix-and-retry loop for failures.
Regenerate or trim the Packet block: it lists knowledge/, prompts/, examples/, agents/, and templates/ directories that don't exist in the bundle, and the playbook/check.sh also reference missing schemas/, examples/, and evals/ paths.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence (the When-NOT table, a 3-step procedure, a short checklist), but trimmable noise remains: the generated Spanish "Packet" block, Spanish Contract labels ("Aceptación/Límites/Casos borde"), and scattered [EXPLICIT]/[INFERENCE]/[SUPUESTO] tags add tokens without guiding the task. Not 5 (unnecessary tokens present); well above 3 (no padded explanations of things Claude already knows). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The body's procedure is high-level — "Apply its decision tables; pick the strategy explicitly", "Validate against the Quality Criteria" — with no commands or examples in the body itself; the executable guidance (scaffold/validate invocations) exists only one hop away in references/full-playbook.md. Not 4: the body alone doesn't give a user/Claude the concrete steps without opening the reference; above 2 because it does point to one specific, real playbook and a concrete when-not table. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A sequence is listed and a validation step exists ("Validate against the Quality Criteria"), but validation is implicit and abstract — the body never invokes scripts/validate_hook.py or scripts/check.sh (both exist in the bundle) and has no fix-and-retry loop for a workflow that edits settings.json. Not 4: checkpoints are named but not executable in the body; above 2 because the sequence itself is coherent. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Scored against the actual bundle: the resource map cleanly signals one real one-level reference (references/full-playbook.md, substantive). But the generated Packet block lists knowledge/, prompts/, examples/, agents/, templates/ directories that do not exist, and the playbook/check.sh reference schemas/hook-config.schema.json, templates/, examples/, and evals/ that are also absent — navigation claims misdescribe the bundle and several referenced paths are dead. Not 4: the mismatch is more than a minor organization gap; above 2 because the one reference that is signaled does resolve to real content. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |