Business analysis and change router: process modeling, requirements, feasibility, scenarios, enterprise change management, and workshops. Topics: business-process-modeling, change-management-enterprise, change-readiness, feasibility-validation, flow-mapping, requirements-engineering, scenario-analysis, workshop-design, workshop-facilitator.
Router skill. Resolve topic, then Read EXACTLY ONE playbook from routes:. [DOC]
Analyzing the business side of a system: how work flows, what it must do, whether a path is viable, which option wins, or how people adopt the change. Pick by intent: [INFERENCE]
| Signal in request | topic |
|---|---|
| "how does process X run", BPMN, swimlanes | business-process-modeling |
| "end-to-end flows", DDD contexts, integration map | flow-mapping |
| "what must it do", user stories, acceptance criteria | requirements-engineering |
| "can we / should we", build-vs-buy, constraints | feasibility-validation |
| "compare options A/B/C", weighted trade-off | scenario-analysis |
| "design the session", event storming, story mapping | workshop-design / workshop-facilitator |
| org rollout, stakeholder buy-in, adoption risk | change-management-enterprise / change-readiness |
topic from the request; ask ONLY if two topics tie. [DOC]depth=deep → apply the playbook exhaustively, verify at each step; quick → essentials only. [DOC]Spine: Discover → Analyze → Execute → Validate.
Quality gates: constitution v6.0.0 (enforcement), evidence tags (Alfa core set,
EN spelling: [DOC]/[INFERENCE]/[ASSUMPTION]/[CONFIG]/[CODE]), script-first rule. [CONFIG]
assets/checklist.md; score against assets/quality-rubric.json. [DOC]topic when genuinely ambiguous instead of asking. [ASSUMPTION]JaviMontano/jm-adk-beta
fdad39c
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.