Business analysis and change router: process modeling, requirements, feasibility, scenarios, enterprise change management, and workshops. Topics: business-process-modeling, change-management-enterprise, change-readiness, feasibility-validation, flow-mapping, requirements-engineering, scenario-analysis, workshop-design, workshop-facilitator.
Router skill. Resolve topic, then Read EXACTLY ONE playbook from routes:. [DOC]
Analyzing the business side of a system: how work flows, what it must do, whether a path is viable, which option wins, or how people adopt the change. Pick by intent: [INFERENCE]
| Signal in request | topic |
|---|---|
| "how does process X run", BPMN, swimlanes | business-process-modeling |
| "end-to-end flows", DDD contexts, integration map | flow-mapping |
| "what must it do", user stories, acceptance criteria | requirements-engineering |
| "can we / should we", build-vs-buy, constraints | feasibility-validation |
| "compare options A/B/C", weighted trade-off | scenario-analysis |
| "design the session", event storming, story mapping | workshop-design / workshop-facilitator |
| org rollout, stakeholder buy-in, adoption risk | change-management-enterprise / change-readiness |
topic from the request; ask ONLY if two topics tie. [DOC]depth=deep → apply the playbook exhaustively, verify at each step; quick → essentials only. [DOC]Spine: Discover → Analyze → Execute → Validate.
Quality gates: constitution v6.0.0 (enforcement), evidence tags (Alfa core set,
EN spelling: [DOC]/[INFERENCE]/[ASSUMPTION]/[CONFIG]/[CODE]), script-first rule. [CONFIG]
assets/checklist.md; score against assets/quality-rubric.json. [DOC]topic when genuinely ambiguous instead of asking. [ASSUMPTION]fdad39c
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.