Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured skill body: executable examples, a validated workflow with feedback loops, and exemplary progressive disclosure through a Load When reference table. The only improvement area is mild redundancy between the description, the When-to-Use section, and the Coverage Note.
Suggestions
Trim or remove the "Coverage Note" section — it restates the reference table's scope and adds ~60 tokens of duplication.
Shorten the "When to Use This Skill" bullet list, which duplicates the frontmatter description's 'Use when' clause nearly verbatim.
Replace the maintainer credit and documentation link lines with a single compact line, or move them into frontmatter metadata, to save context tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient — compact workflow, tight constraints lists, no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — but "When to Use This Skill" largely duplicates the frontmatter description and the "Coverage Note" section repeats the reference table's scope. These minor instances of redundancy fit anchor 4 ("efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed") rather than the every-token-earns-its-place level of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The skill provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready prompt examples (complete zero-shot and few-shot templates, a before/after optimization pair), concrete MUST DO/MUST NOT rules, a quantified validation threshold ("accuracy < 80%"), and a five-item output checklist. This matches anchor 5 ("fully executable... specific examples cover the common cases"); anchor 4 would imply missing details or gaps. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step Core Workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit validation checkpoint ("If accuracy < 80% on the test set, identify failure patterns before iterating") and feedback loops ("Make one change at a time; refine based on failures"). This matches anchor 5's requirement of explicit validation steps and error-recovery loops; anchor 4 would require a missing or implicit checkpoint. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview and all detail is pushed to six one-level-deep reference files, each listed in a table with explicit "Load When" conditions; all six referenced paths exist in references/. This matches anchor 5 ("clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references; easy navigation"). | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |