CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

secure-code-guardian

Use when implementing authentication/authorization, securing user input, or preventing OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities — including custom security implementations such as hashing passwords with bcrypt/argon2, sanitizing SQL queries with parameterized statements, configuring CORS/CSP headers, validating input with Zod, and setting up JWT tokens. Invoke for authentication, authorization, input validation, encryption, OWASP Top 10 prevention, secure session management, and security hardening. For pre-built OAuth/SSO integrations or standalone security audits, consider a more specialized skill.

72

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a strong security skill with excellent actionability — the code examples are concrete, executable, and cover the key security patterns well. The workflow includes proper validation checkpoints with specific test cases. The main weaknesses are moderate verbosity (some redundancy between constraints and code examples, plus unnecessary knowledge references) and unverifiable progressive disclosure references since no bundle files exist.

Suggestions

Remove the 'Knowledge Reference' line — Claude already knows these concepts, and it adds no actionable value.

Move the longer code examples (especially the full endpoint flow) into the referenced files (e.g., references/authentication.md) to keep SKILL.md as a concise overview, and ensure those bundle files actually exist.

Consolidate the MUST DO/MUST NOT DO constraints that are already demonstrated in the code examples to reduce redundancy.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is mostly efficient with good code examples, but includes some unnecessary elements like the 'Knowledge Reference' list at the bottom (Claude already knows these concepts), the 'Output Templates' section is vague filler, and some inline comments over-explain obvious things. The MUST DO/MUST NOT DO lists partially restate what the code examples already demonstrate.

2 / 3

Actionability

Excellent executable code examples covering password hashing, parameterized queries, input validation, JWT verification, and a full endpoint flow. All examples are copy-paste ready TypeScript with specific libraries, concrete configurations (salt rounds, rate limit values, cookie settings), and anti-patterns explicitly shown as comments.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The core workflow is clearly sequenced (threat model → design → implement → validate → document) with explicit validation checkpoints that specify what to test for each security domain (authentication, authorization, input handling, headers). The checkpoints include concrete test payloads (SQL injection strings, XSS payloads) and verification tools (curl, Mozilla Observatory), providing feedback loops for error detection.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The reference table with 'Load When' guidance is well-structured and clearly signaled, but no bundle files were provided, so the referenced files (references/owasp-prevention.md, references/authentication.md, etc.) cannot be verified to exist. The main file itself is fairly long (~150 lines of code examples) where some could potentially be moved to the referenced files, keeping the SKILL.md leaner.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is an excellent skill description that hits all the key criteria. It provides highly specific concrete actions with named technologies, includes abundant natural trigger terms, explicitly states both what it does and when to use it, and even includes negative boundaries to reduce conflict with related skills. The description is well-structured and concise despite its thoroughness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: hashing passwords with bcrypt/argon2, sanitizing SQL queries with parameterized statements, configuring CORS/CSP headers, validating input with Zod, setting up JWT tokens. These are highly specific and actionable.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (custom security implementations like hashing, sanitizing, configuring headers, validating input, JWT setup) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when implementing authentication/authorization, securing user input, or preventing OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities' and 'Invoke for...' clause). Also includes a helpful negative boundary ('For pre-built OAuth/SSO integrations or standalone security audits, consider a more specialized skill').

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: authentication, authorization, input validation, encryption, OWASP Top 10, bcrypt, argon2, SQL, CORS, CSP, JWT, session management, security hardening, passwords, Zod. These are terms developers naturally use when seeking security help.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clearly scoped to custom security implementations with explicit boundaries distinguishing it from OAuth/SSO integrations and standalone security audits. The specific technologies mentioned (bcrypt, argon2, Zod, JWT, CORS/CSP) create a distinct niche that is unlikely to conflict with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
Jeffallan/claude-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.