Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, example-driven overview: fully executable code covering the common secure-coding cases, an explicit validation-checkpoint checklist, and a clean progressive-disclosure structure pointing to real one-level-deep reference files. Minor improvements possible: trim the keyword-list footer and add an explicit validate→fix→retry loop to the checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely efficient — code comments are instructive ('value passed separately — never interpolated', 'Generic message — do not reveal whether email exists') and no sections explain concepts Claude already knows. Minor trimmable content exists: the 'Knowledge Reference' keyword list ('OWASP Top 10, bcrypt/argon2, JWT, OAuth 2.0, OIDC, CSP, CORS...') and the footer attribution/doc links add tokens without actionable value. This fits the 4 anchor ('minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'), not 5 ('every token earns its place'). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Five complete, executable TypeScript examples cover the common cases: bcrypt hashing with salt-rounds guidance, parameterized pg queries, Zod safeParse validation, JWT verification with an explicit algorithm allowlist, and a full login endpoint wiring helmet, rate limiting, scoped tokens, and httpOnly cookies. All are copy-paste ready, matching the 5 anchor; the 4 anchor's 'minor gaps' does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (Threat model, Design, Implement, Validate, Document) is paired with an explicit Validation Checkpoints section containing concrete test payloads ("' OR 1=1--", "<script>alert(1)</script>") and verification commands (curl -I, Mozilla Observatory). It falls short of the 5 anchor because there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop — checkpoints say to verify after each step but never state what to do when a check fails — so 'most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps' (4) is the best fit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md serves as a well-organized overview with a Reference Guide table mapping each topic to an existing one-level-deep file in references/ with explicit 'Load When' conditions, and quick-start code examples are appropriately kept inline while detailed patterns live in the five reference files. This matches the 5 anchor ('clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references; content appropriately split; easy navigation'). | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |