Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured reference skill: critical directives, a decision rule, a tool quick reference, and a routed reference index keep it actionable and token-efficient. The main improvement opportunity is an explicit validation step in the workflow (e.g. re-inspect the module to confirm the dependency resolved) and slightly tighter directive phrasing.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation step to the Common Workflow, e.g. "5. Verify: re-run mps_mcp_get_project_structure(startingPoint=<module>) and confirm the new dependency/used language appears".
Split the multi-clause language-OWN-version directive into a short rule plus a pointer to references/module-info-fields.md, trimming the in-body explanation of fromVersion computation.
Include one concrete mps_mcp_module_dependency or mps_mcp_model_used_language call (tool name + key arguments) in the MCP Tools Quick Reference so the most common action is copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and expert-level with no padding or teaching of known concepts, but a few directives (notably the language-OWN-version bullet) pack many clauses into single sentences that could be trimmed or split. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete tool names with parameters ("mps_mcp_get_project_structure(startingPoint=<module>)", "mps_mcp_create_module(type='solution')") and a decision rule for dependency vs. used language; minor gaps remain since actual wiring call examples are deferred to references. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Inspect → Diagnose → Apply → Rebuild workflow is clearly sequenced with a pitfalls-diagnosis feedback step and a rebuild checkpoint, but there is no explicit post-change validation that the wiring resolved the symptom. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a lean overview with a "Start here — most common case" routing guide, one-level-deep reference entries each with a clear purpose statement, and a Related Skills section — easy to navigate with details properly external. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |