Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An excellent reference skill body: dense, non-obvious, and highly actionable with concrete MCP tool calls and a well-organized reference structure. The only gap is the absence of an explicit validate→fix→re-validate feedback loop in the workflow, though a validation step is present.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and information-dense throughout — it assumes Claude's competence, gives a single one-line Java analogy, and fills every directive with non-obvious MPS-specific facts (constructors run before attach, quotations bypass constructors, non-virtual-by-default, null-node call behavior) rather than padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: named MCP tools with parameters ('mps_mcp_create_model' with modelName '<lang>.behavior', 'featureKind: STATEMENTS'), exact model names, a modifier table with concrete call shapes, and pointer blueprints for insertion. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Common-Path Workflow' is a clear five-step sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint (step 5: 'Validate with mps_mcp_check_root_node_problems, rebuild the language'), but it lacks an explicit error-recovery feedback loop (validate → fix → re-validate), so it sits just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview backed by a well-signaled, one-level-deep 'Reference Index' where each entry uses 'Open X when [scenario]' navigation (method-declarations, constructors, local-and-super-calls, etc.), keeping bulky JSON blueprints and verbatim examples out of the body while making discovery easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |