Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, highly actionable reference skill whose body stays lean by offloading detail to eight well-signaled reference files, with a clear modifier table and a numbered workflow. The only gap is that the workflow's validation feedback loop is implicit rather than spelled out inline.
Suggestions
Make the validation feedback loop explicit in the Common-Path Workflow: after 'Validate with mps_mcp_check_root_node_problems', add an 'if problems are reported, fix them and re-run the check; only rebuild once it is clean' step so error recovery is inline rather than only in common-failures.md.
Consider moving the verbose per-row 'Notes' column of the Method Modifier Quick Reference table (e.g. the baseLanguage example callouts) into references/method-declarations.md to further tighten the overview, since the call-shape and dispatch columns already carry the core guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section carries MPS-specific domain knowledge (behavior-aspect internals, MRO, modifier dispatch, MCP tool names) rather than explaining concepts Claude already knows, and detailed material is offloaded to eight reference files — lean and efficient with no padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable guidance: named MCP tools (mps_mcp_insert_root_node_from_json, mps_mcp_parse_java_and_insert, mps_mcp_check_root_node_problems), exact model-naming ('<lang>.behavior'), JSON blueprint pointers, and a modifier table with concrete call shapes (node.m(...), ConceptName.m(...)). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Common-Path Workflow is a clearly numbered 5-step sequence with a validation step ('Validate with mps_mcp_check_root_node_problems, rebuild the language'), but it lacks an explicit validate→fix→revalidate feedback loop inline — error recovery is only referenced indirectly via common-failures.md, so it does not reach the 'explicit feedback loops' top anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview (Critical Directives, Common-Path Workflow, Modifier Quick Reference, Related Skills, Reference Index) with a clearly signaled, one-level-deep Reference Index whose eight 'Open X when ...' entries all resolve to real files in references/. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |