Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, well-organized reference skill with concrete tooling guidance and an excellent validated workflow, undermined only by a broken reference layer — the ~14 referenced files are absent from the bundle.
Suggestions
Ship the missing references/ files (landscape.md, json-blueprints.md, substitute-menus.md, selection-and-deletion.md, etc.) so the Reference Index targets resolve; a dangling reference layer is the weakest part of an otherwise strong skill.
Trim the Reference Index entries to a short purpose line per file and move the detailed content summaries into the files themselves, reducing token cost without losing navigation.
Inline at least one minimal JSON blueprint (e.g. a default substitute menu) directly in SKILL.md so the most common task is actionable without opening references/json-blueprints.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean reference material with no padding about basics Claude already knows, but the Reference Index pre-summarizes each file in dense prose and a few editorial notes ('Older docs lie') could be trimmed. Not a 5 because of these minor over-explanation instances; not a 3 because almost every line earns its place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable guidance — real MCP tool names (mps_mcp_insert_root_node_from_json, mps_mcp_search_concepts), real role names, naming conventions, and validation commands — but the copy-paste JSON blueprints are deferred to references/json-blueprints.md rather than included inline. Not a 5 due to those deferred specifics; not a 3 because the inline guidance is largely executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 9-step Common-Path Workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation (step 7: mps_mcp_check_root_node_problems on every touched root), interactive testing (step 8), and a diagnose/feedback loop (step 9: Ctrl+Alt+B), matching the anchor for clear sequence with explicit validation and feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-structured with a clear overview and a dedicated, well-signaled Reference Index pointing to ~14 references/*.md files — but none of those referenced files exist in the bundle, so the navigation targets are broken. Not a 4 because the referenced materials are absent (a major organization gap, per the guideline to score against actual bundle structure); not a 2 because the body's own structure and signaling are strong. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |