Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, concise reference body with a clear workflow and concrete guidance. The main weakness is progressive disclosure: the Reference Index points to reference files that are absent from the bundle.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced reference files (plan-setup.md, step-catalog.md, checkpoints.md, etc.) in a references/ directory so each 'open when...' pointer resolves to real content.
Add an explicit validate-fix-retry loop around the verification step (e.g., re-run mps_mcp_check_root_node_problems until problems clear) to strengthen workflow_clarity.
Tighten the Critical Directives section by collapsing closely related bullets to trim remaining over-explanation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body with tight definitions, directives, and a numbered workflow; assumes Claude's familiarity with MPS and avoids padding, with only minor over-explanation in a few directives. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete named concepts, cardinalities, file patterns, and specific MCP tool calls (mps_mcp_create_model, mps_mcp_check_root_node_problems); mostly executable guidance with minor gaps since it is instruction-oriented rather than code-bearing. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An 8-step Common-Path Workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit verification step (Show generation plan + check_root_node_problems), though a full validate-fix-retry feedback loop is only implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well structured with a clearly signaled one-level-deep Reference Index using 'open when...' triggers, but the referenced references/*.md files do not exist in the bundle, so the disclosure points to missing material. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |