Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured reference overview: lean and concrete, with a sequenced workflow that includes validation, critical guardrails, and a clearly navigated set of one-level-deep references. It assumes Claude's competence while deferring executable detail to verified bundle files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence—concrete concept names, language id/version, cardinalities, and MCP tool calls with no padding beyond a brief two-sentence motivation. Not a 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, actionable guidance—exact concept names (Plan, Transform, Checkpoint, Fork, PlanContribution), cardinalities ('1..n', cardinality 1), file pattern '<name>@genplan.mps', and named MCP tools (mps_mcp_create_model, mps_mcp_check_root_node_problems). Per the instruction-only scoring note, the absence of inline JSON is not penalized because the guidance is specific and the verified blueprints are correctly deferred to references. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Common-Path Workflow' is a clearly sequenced 8-step process ending in an explicit validation step ('Verify with MPS UI Show generation plan and mps_mcp_check_root_node_problems'), reinforced by 'Critical Directives' guardrails and an authoring-checklist reference. Not a 2 because validation is explicit rather than missing or merely implicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview with a well-signaled 'Reference Index' of ten one-level-deep reference links, each prefaced with an 'open when…' trigger; all referenced files were verified present in ./references/, and detailed JSON/catalog content is appropriately split out rather than inlined. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |