Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered reference skill: the body carries only high-value, non-inferable rules and routes everything else through clearly signaled one-level-deep references. The main improvements are inline JSON payload examples for the common insert path and an explicit validate-fix-revalidate loop in the workflow. No bundle files were present to verify the referenced paths exist.
Suggestions
Include one minimal copy-paste-ready `mps_mcp_insert_root_node_from_json` JSON payload for a file-generating `ConceptTextGenDeclaration` directly in the workflow step, keeping the full vocabulary in references/json-blueprints.md.
Add an explicit feedback loop to workflow step 6, e.g. "If `mps_mcp_check_root_node_problems` reports errors, fix and re-check before rebuilding" rather than relying solely on references/common-failures.md.
Deduplicate the used-languages prerequisite: state the three required languages once (either the prerequisite paragraph or workflow step 1) and cross-reference the other location.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with non-obvious, MPS-specific knowledge (concept-exact dispatch, the depth-counter indentation model, required used languages) and avoids explaining general concepts, but the model-creation/three-used-languages prerequisite is stated twice — once in the prerequisite paragraph and again nearly verbatim in workflow step 1 — so minor trimming is possible. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, near-executable guidance throughout: named MCP tools with parameter values ("`mps_mcp_create_model` with `moduleName: "<lang>"` and `modelName: "<lang>.textGen"`") and exact statement forms; it falls short of fully copy-paste-ready because complete JSON payload shapes are delegated to references/json-blueprints.md rather than shown inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Common-Path Workflow is a clearly sequenced six-step process with a pre-flight prerequisite, named failure modes ("unresolved-concept errors"), and an explicit validation step ("Validate with `mps_mcp_check_root_node_problems`, rebuild the language module, regenerate any consumer"), but an explicit fix-and-re-validate feedback loop is not stated in the workflow itself — error recovery is routed to references/common-failures.md. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Exemplary structure: a "Start here — most common case" routing line, eight one-level-deep references each signaled with an "Open X when Y" trigger, and a Related Skills section giving each companion's purpose; the body stays an overview while details (AST shapes, worked examples, failure modes) live in references. Note: no references/ directory was present in the evaluated workspace, so referenced paths could not be verified on disk. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |