CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

mps-bugfix

Structured MPS bugfix workflow driven by a YouTrack issue ID — preflight tool checks, version/branch derivation, parallel-agent problem analysis, solution design, branch creation, implementation, review, and YouTrack updates. Use when the user invokes "/bugfix", asks to "fix a bug", "work on a bug", "investigate an issue", or provides a YouTrack issue ID.

70

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, clearly sequenced multi-phase workflow with strong validation gates and progressive-disclosure signaling. Its main weakness is that the detailed reference files it points to are missing from the bundle, leaving some actionability and disclosure promises unfulfilled.

Suggestions

Ship the referenced `references/*.md` files (issue-fields, platform-prompt, version-prompt, branch-naming, explore-prompts, root-cause-template, review-checklist, completion-comment) so the deferred prompts, templates, and branch-naming table are actually available.

De-duplicate the approval-gate and 'prefer the source of truth' directives — state each once in Critical Directives and reference it from Phase 4/5 instead of repeating the full text.

Add a couple of natural trigger variants (e.g. "report a bug", "regression", "defect") to broaden trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is a lean workflow outline that assumes Claude's competence about git, YouTrack, and MPS, but the approval-gate and 'prefer fixing the source of truth' directives are repeated 2–3 times across Critical Directives, Phase 4, and Phase 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides real executable commands (`git branch -r --list 'origin/20*'`, `git checkout`, named `mcp_idea_*` / `get_issue` / `update_issue` tools), but key prompts, templates, and the branch-naming table are deferred to `references/*.md` files that are not present in the bundle.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Phases 0–7 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (Phase 0 preflight stops on missing tools, per-change validation), approval gates before implementation, and a review fix-loop; the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

In-body signaling is exemplary with a dedicated Reference Index and one-level-deep references, but the referenced `references/*.md` bundle files do not exist on disk, so the cross-file structure is promised but unrealized.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is excellent: it concisely states a concrete multi-step capability and pairs it with explicit, natural trigger phrases anchored to a specific YouTrack-driven niche. Only minor trigger-term variants are missing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — preflight tool checks, version/branch derivation, parallel-agent problem analysis, solution design, branch creation, implementation, review, and YouTrack updates — giving comprehensive coverage rather than vague language.

5 / 5

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (structured MPS bugfix workflow with enumerated phases) and 'when' (explicit "Use when..." clause with concrete trigger phrases), matching the anchor example closely.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Strong natural triggers are present ("/bugfix", "fix a bug", "work on a bug", "investigate an issue", YouTrack issue ID), but a few common variants like "report a bug", "regression", or "defect" are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (MPS bugfix workflow driven by a YouTrack issue ID) with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 16 missing

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
JetBrains/MPS
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.