Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured router skill body that assumes competence, points cleanly to per-aspect skills, and gives concrete tooling and sequencing. Minor conciseness redundancy and the absence of a full executable example are the only drags on an otherwise strong reference.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the root-cause re-check guidance: state it once in 'Critical Directives' and reference it from 'Validation Flow' rather than restating it.
Add one short end-to-end worked example (e.g. adding a concept then re-validating downstream aspects) to lift actionability and workflow_clarity toward fully executable guidance.
Tighten the 'MCP Tools You'll Use Often' list by grouping or trimming so every listed tool maps to a step in the authoring/validation flow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and table/bullet-driven, assuming MPS competence without padding; the only trim is minor redundancy where the root-cause re-check directive recurs in both 'Critical Directives' and 'Validation Flow'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It supplies concrete MCP tool names, exact model file paths, aspect IDs, and call syntax (e.g. 'node.m(...)', 'error ... fix { ... }'); as a router it has no full executable code block, but the guidance is specific and actionable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered authoring order (1-9) and validation flow (1-4) with checkpoints plus a dependencies section give clear sequencing and a stated feedback loop, though the validation steps are brief without detailed error-recovery sub-steps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | As a router, the body is a clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to dedicated aspect skills via a 'Detailed skill' table column, with content appropriately split and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |