Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary router/reference skill: lean, table-driven, and densely actionable with specific tool names and file paths, a sequenced authoring order, and explicit validation checkpoints. Progressive disclosure is handled exactly as intended, delegating depth to one-level-deep companion skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and structured — a compact aspects table, ordered authoring steps, tool lists, and short directives — and assumes Claude's familiarity with MPS rather than explaining basics; nearly every line (aspect table, call patterns, rebuild rules, validation flow) earns its place, matching the lean score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, specific guidance — named MCP tools (e.g. `mps_mcp_get_project_structure`, `mps_mcp_alter_structure`), exact file paths (`models/structure.mps`, `generator/template/main@generator.mps`), and call snippets (`node.m(...)`, `error ... fix { ... }`); per the scoring notes, an instruction/router skill is not penalized for lacking full code blocks when guidance is this actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The "Typical Authoring Order" gives a clear 9-step sequence and the "Validation Flow" provides explicit checkpoints (check problems → build → regenerate → inspect) with root-cause error-recovery guidance in Critical Directives, satisfying the clear-sequence-with-explicit-validation anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is the canonical router pattern: a concise overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep links (a "Detailed skill" column plus inline links) to ~15 dedicated per-aspect skills and one reference doc, splitting detail appropriately and making navigation easy; no nested multi-level reference chains exist. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |