Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, expert-oriented overview that pairs concrete directives and a validated workflow with a well-signaled one-level-deep reference catalog. It avoids pedagogy, assumes competence, and routes detail to the right files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line carries concept names, error signatures, or tool names, and it assumes competence throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, actionable guidance — exact MCP tool calls (`mps_mcp_parse_java_and_insert`, `mps_mcp_check_root_node_problems`), precise decision rules (`SLinkAccess` for 0..1/1 vs `SLinkListAccess` for 0..n/1..n), and specific error signatures to watch for — which meets the actionable bar for an instruction skill even though executable blueprints live in references. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step numbered sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint (step 5, `mps_mcp_check_root_node_problems`) and an error-recovery branch (step 6, adding used languages/dependencies on import failures), plus a pitfalls checklist in Critical Directives. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-organized overview pointing to 18 one-level-deep reference files (all verified to exist), with a dedicated Reference Index annotating each file's purpose for easy navigation; content is appropriately split between the overview and references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |