Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally actionable, tool-precise reference with a well-validated workflow and clearly signaled external references. Its weaknesses are mild: some duplicated caveats, one unwieldy paragraph, and detail that could be pushed into the referenced files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with tool-specific semantics Claude cannot know (exact error strings, null-triplet rules, factory behavior) and wastes no tokens on generic explanation, but the two-element-triplet rejection is repeated across four places, the dry-run name-lookup warning is explained twice, and the MOVE semantics sit in one ~450-word paragraph that could be a table. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: exact tool names with parameter triplets, a copy-paste heredoc invocation of scripts/blueprint.py with its printed output, and table_to_bulk_insert.py commands including a --verify round-trip with sample output. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Common Workflow is a clearly sequenced six-step process with an explicit validation checkpoint (mps_mcp_check_root_node_problems, fixReferences.stillBroken), dry-run-before-write guidance, and feedback loops (quickFixes / mps_mcp_apply_intention, FIX_REFERENCES repair), fully covering this destructive/batch-capable skill. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A dedicated Reference Index signals one-level-deep references well ("Open references/json-format.md when you need…"), but substantial specialized detail (node-factory composition rules, the full MOVE semantics) is inlined rather than split out, and cross-skill pointer chains into mps-mcp-workflow references add indirection. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |