Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and well-structured with appropriate external references, but the workflow lacks explicit validation/verification checkpoints and leaves the in-place typography path without a backup, which caps workflow clarity. Tightening the report template and adding an output-validation step would raise the score.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after Step 4/Step 6 (e.g., re-read the formatted file to confirm markdown is well-formed and no content was lost) before reporting completion.
Protect the 'Typography only' in-place path by backing up the original file before Step 6 modifies it, mirroring the backup logic already present in Step 5.
Consider moving the full completion-report template (Step 7) and the detailed EXTEND.md option tables into a reference file to tighten the main SKILL.md body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient — actionable tables for script options, formatting toolkit, and EXTEND.md settings rather than padded prose — and avoids over-explaining basic concepts Claude already knows, but the completion-report template and the trailing Notes section contain content that could be trimmed, sitting just below the lean score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable guidance: concrete bash invocations with a complete script-options table, real file paths, substitution rules for {baseDir}/${BUN_X}, and copy-paste-ready examples covering the common cases (default, --quotes, --no-spacing), matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 7-step workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit Analyze→Format structure and a backup step for the formatted output, but the 'Typography only' path modifies the original file in-place with no backup or output validation, and there is no verification step on the formatted result — validation gaps that cap this at 3 per the destructive/batch-operations rule. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with one-level-deep, well-signaled references: title-generation detail is correctly externalized to references/title-formulas.md (a real file) and scripts are documented in a table pointing to real files in scripts/. It stops at 4 because a fair amount of inline material (the full completion-report template, detailed EXTEND.md option tables) could be further externalized. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |