Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable multi-step workflow with clear sequencing and validation checkpoints, backed by a real one-level reference bundle. The main weaknesses are mild verbosity in the tool-resolution sections and a small count discrepancy in the References list.
Suggestions
Tighten the User Input Tools and Image Generation Tools sections by collapsing the repeated 'substitute the local equivalent' caveats into a single note and trimming embedded runtime rationale.
Fix the References list: it says '21 style definitions' but the Style Gallery and references/styles/ contain 22 styles.
Consider moving the dense Codex/Cursor backend-discovery procedure (already partly in references/codex-imagegen.md) further out of the main body to reduce inline token weight.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with concrete tables and code blocks, but the User Input Tools and Image Generation Tools sections embed runtime rationale and repeat the 'substitute local equivalent' caveat, adding tokens Claude could largely infer. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable: concrete file paths, an output tree, a YAML frontmatter schema, backup/slug rules, and explicit backend routing cover the common cases copy-paste ready. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven numbered steps with a hard confirmation gate, backup-rename checkpoints, retry-once, and an explicit text-correction feedback loop for a destructive-ish raster output. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Overview cleanly points to one-level-deep real bundle files (layouts/, styles/, config/, analysis-framework, base-prompt), but the References list states '21 style definitions' while 22 styles exist — a minor accuracy/organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |