Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, highly actionable with specific tool calls and file paths, and well-organized for a single-purpose skill. The only minor gap is the absence of an explicit validate-retry feedback loop in the batch component workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line instructs a concrete action, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable: specific tool calls (`cad.catalog` with `action="search"/"detail"/"acquire"`), exact file paths (`cad/research/parts/<wave>/*.json`, `cad/part-plan.json`), the `cadPartPlanSchema`, and a precise exact/partial/rejected classification rubric, fitting the fully actionable anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Both workflows are clearly sequenced with numbered steps and a classification checkpoint that gates substitution, but there is no explicit validate-fix-retry loop, so it sits at 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps' rather than level 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines, has no need for external references (none present in the bundle), and is well-organized into clear sections ('Research workflow', 'Main-agent handoff'), meeting the simple-skill exception for a level-5 score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |