sendcutsend

Review DXF and STEP/STP uploads for SendCutSend.com orders using its ordering guide, catalog, and specs. Use only for SendCutSend.com preflight reports covering upload readiness, selected material/SKU/thickness/service availability, and service-specific checks for laser cutting, CNC routing, bending, tapping, countersinking, hardware insertion, and finishing.

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized, evidence-driven review skill body that defers detail to real reference files and names concrete inspection primitives. It would benefit from a couple of executable code snippets and an explicit validate-retry loop to push actionability and workflow clarity to the top level.

Suggestions

Add one or two short, copy-paste-ready build123d snippets for the common DXF and STEP inspection measurements so the skill is fully executable without inventing code.

Make the source-fetch / inspection failure path an explicit validate->report->retry loop (e.g., if a source fetch fails, retry once, then surface the unavailable-source outcome) to strengthen workflow_clarity.

Tighten the provenance paragraph and the 'Treat SendCutSend's ordering guide... not stable APIs' sentence into one line to remove minor verbosity.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Efficient and assumes competence (no explanation of what DXF/STEP or cutting services are), with every line earning its place; the provenance block and a few defensive normalization sentences could be trimmed slightly, so it is below the lean 5.	4 / 5
Actionability	Names concrete, executable primitives (build123d.import_step, build123d.ezdxf, the Replicator handoff, real reference files) and specific per-service checks, but provides no copy-paste-ready code blocks covering common cases, so it is below 5.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clearly sequenced 4-step workflow with explicit checkpoints (confirm before verdict, report unavailable sources rather than issuing ready verdicts); no explicit validate-fix-retry loop for the review itself, so it sits below 5, and the destructive/batch cap does not apply since this is a read-only preflight skill.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Concise overview body with well-signaled, one-level-deep references (official-sources.md, review-checks.md, report-template.md) that all resolve to real files, splitting detail appropriately with easy navigation.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific, third-person description that clearly scopes the skill to SendCutSend preflight reviews and enumerates concrete services and file types. The main weakness is the 'when' clause reads as a scope restriction rather than a natural user trigger phrase.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists many concrete actions (review DXF/STEP uploads, preflight reports on upload readiness, material/SKU/thickness/service availability, and per-service checks for laser cutting, CNC routing, bending, tapping, countersinking, hardware insertion, finishing), giving comprehensive coverage rather than the minor gaps of a 4.	5 / 5
Completeness	Clear 'what' (review uploads / preflight reports / service-specific checks) and an explicit 'Use only for SendCutSend.com preflight reports' trigger clause, but the 'when' is a scope restriction rather than a concrete natural trigger phrase, keeping it below 5.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Good keyword coverage including file extensions (DXF, STEP/STP) and the full service vocabulary a SendCutSend user would say, but the phrasing is domain-jargon dense rather than spanning broad natural synonyms, so it sits below a 5.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The SendCutSend.com niche with DXF/STEP/STP and cutting-service triggers is highly specific with minimal overlap risk versus any other skill.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: JimmyPang02/open-replicator
Path: skills/sendcutsend/SKILL.md
Commit: 18436cc

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.