Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable delegation guide with concrete output contracts, a clear decision table, and sequenced chaining patterns that include validation. Its only weaknesses are a slightly padded rationale section and no offloading of detail content into reference files as the skill grows.
Suggestions
Trim "Why this exists" to a single sentence (e.g., "Compressed tool results mean ~1/3 the main-context tokens per delegation") and fold the 2k-token/20-delegation example into the rule-of-thumb line.
Move the three output-contract templates into a references/output-contracts.md file, keeping one-line summaries in SKILL.md, so the contracts load only when a delegation is actually made.
Merge the overlapping rows of "What NOT to do" into the decision table's Use column to eliminate the duplicated guidance between the two sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The decision table and output contracts are dense and token-efficient, but "Why this exists (the real win)" re-explains subagent context mechanics with a quantified scenario that could be trimmed to one line. Matches the 4 anchor (efficient, minor over-explanation) rather than 5, where every token earns its place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Output contracts are literal copy-paste templates with terminal first-tokens, sort order, and grep-safe formats; the decision table covers common task shapes; chaining steps are concrete ("Spawn 2-3 investigator calls ... defs vs callers vs tests"). Fully actionable guidance for an instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Chaining patterns are numbered and sequenced (locate → fix → verify), with explicit validation checkpoints (builder's "verified: re-read OK | mismatch @ path:line", reviewer audits the diff) and error-recovery signals ("too-big.", "regressed."). No destructive or batch operations, so no validation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and navigable, but the ~70-line body exceeds the 50-line simple-skill exception and keeps everything inline with no content split. Matches the 4 anchor (good structure, most content appropriately placed) rather than 5, which requires appropriately split content with well-signaled references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |