Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, highly actionable commit-message spec with concrete templates, real-diff examples, and explicit inclusion/exclusion checklists, all without padding. Its only weak spot is that guidance is rule-list rather than sequenced-workflow, leaving a minor validation-checkpoint gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence ("Write commit messages terse and exact. Conventional Commits format. No fluff. Why over what.") with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows, matching the anchor for 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete subject-line template, an enumerated type list, hard char limits, copy-paste-ready example blocks tied to real diffs, and explicit inclusion/exclusion rules — fully executable guidance covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Rules and the Auto-Clarity always-include checklist give a clear, unambiguous single-purpose process, but it is presented as a rule list rather than a sequenced workflow with an explicit verify/checkpoint feedback loop, fitting 4 more than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is short, single-purpose, and has no need for external bundle files (none exist); its well-organized sections (Rules, Examples, Auto-Clarity, Boundaries) satisfy the simple-skill exception for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |