Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tightly written, evidence-first workflow with strong validation gating and a concrete reporting template. Its only real weakness is slightly limited progressive disclosure since all detail lives in a single moderately long file with no external references.
Suggestions
Consider extracting the report-output template or the supported/retired id tables into a reference file to shorten the main body and aid navigation.
Add one concrete fixture/command example for the paired baseline/candidate eval to close the minor actionability gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, assumes Claude's competence, and avoids explaining background concepts; only minor repeated 'Do not...' constraint phrasing could be tightened, fitting the 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides an executable command ('caveman opportunities list'), exact profile ids, and a concrete report template with mostly executable guidance; minor gaps remain around fixture/command specifics for the paired eval, matching the 'mostly executable, minor gaps' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps each carry explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops (stop-and-report blockers, stop with no edit, revert on regression), matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps and feedback loops' anchor for a destructive/edit workflow. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is self-contained with well-organized numbered sections; at ~100 lines it slightly exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill threshold, so it sits at 'good structure, appropriately placed' rather than the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |