Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is admirably lean and appropriately structured for a compact skill, but its directives stay high-level: it lacks concrete execution steps, numbered sequencing, and an explicit validate-fix-retry loop around its acceptance check.
Suggestions
Number the bullets into an explicit build sequence (acceptance → trace → deliver → reuse → omit → verify) so the workflow order is unambiguous.
Add a brief validate-fix-retry loop around 'Run focused proof' (e.g., 'If the proof fails, fix the smallest responsible layer and re-run; stop only when acceptance passes').
Give one or two directives a concrete, executable anchor (e.g., name the command or test pattern used for the 'focused proof') to lift actionability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely lean: terse intro, seven tight bullets, and a two-sentence close with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The bullets give concrete directives (derive acceptance, trace entry point, omit modes/providers/config/extensibility) with some specific lists, but as an instruction-only skill it lacks the concrete steps or worked examples needed to fully execute each directive. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A rough sequence is derivable from the bullets and the closing 'Run focused proof. Stop when acceptance passes.' provides a validation checkpoint, but steps are unnumbered, the ordering between principles is implicit, and there is no error-recovery feedback loop. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short (under 50 lines), single-purpose skill with no need for external references, organized into a heading, intro, bullet list, and closing line — meeting the simple-skill exception for well-organized structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |