scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills --skill scientific-critical-thinkingOverall
score
17%
Does it follow best practices?
Validation for skill structure
Activation
SkippedImplementation
SkippedValidation
75%Validation — 12 / 16 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' must be a string, got object | Fail |
skill_md_line_count | SKILL.md is long (572 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking | Warning |
description_trigger_hint | Description may be missing an explicit 'when to use' trigger hint (e.g., 'Use when...') | Warning |
metadata_version | 'metadata.version' is missing | Warning |
Total | 12 / 16 Failed | |
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.