CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

scientific-writing

Draft, revise, and audit scientific manuscripts or reports with explicit evidence provenance, reporting-guideline coverage, authorship accountability, confidentiality controls, and local consistency checks. Use for manuscript sections, references, declarations, tables, figures, or submission preparation when scientific accuracy and traceability matter.

75

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is scientific-writing in K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tightly structured, highly actionable scientific-writing workflow with explicit validation checkpoints, feedback loops, and clean one-level-deep references to a verified bundle. Its only real weakness is mild verbosity from inline time-sensitive dates and enumerative safety lists.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Largely operational and assumes Claude's competence with little concept-explanation padding, but inline time-sensitive markers ('researched on 2026-07-24', 'CONSORT 2025', 'ICMJE January 2026') and enumerative lists (the 'Never invent' bullets, intake list) could be trimmed; not a 5 because not every token earns its place, not a 3 since the COPE retirement is appropriately framed as deprecated rather than current.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready commands at each tooling step (scaffold, select_reporting_guidelines, check_consistency, validate_manifest, audit_claims, check_references, validate_authorship, lint_manuscript) with concrete arguments and file names, plus explicit ID conventions and inline claim markers, matching the fully-executable anchor.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A 12-step numbered workflow with explicit validation steps (validate_manifest, lint_manuscript, check_consistency), feedback loops ('Resolve every mismatch manually', 're-run every affected audit'), and human-approval gates/checklists (the declarations checklist, revision 7-step loop), matching the explicit-validation-with-feedback-loops anchor.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is a clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references ('See references/...') and a complete 'Bundled files' inventory; all referenced scripts, references, and assets verified as real files, so navigation is easy and content is appropriately split.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concrete, complete, and distinct, explicitly pairing a 'what' with a 'Use for' trigger clause and naming multiple specific audit dimensions. Its only mild gap is trigger-term synonym coverage (e.g., paper/article).

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions ('Draft, revise, and audit') plus the comprehensive coverage of what is audited ('evidence provenance, reporting-guideline coverage, authorship accountability, confidentiality controls, and local consistency checks'), matching the comprehensive-coverage anchor; not a 4 since coverage is broad rather than having minor gaps.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers what ('Draft, revise, and audit scientific manuscripts or reports with...') and when ('Use for manuscript sections, references, declarations, tables, figures, or submission preparation when scientific accuracy and traceability matter'), matching the explicit-both anchor with a concrete 'Use for' trigger.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural keyword coverage ('manuscripts or reports', 'manuscript sections', 'references', 'declarations', 'tables, figures', 'submission preparation'), but common synonyms a user might say ('paper', 'article', 'journal submission') are absent, so it sits just below the comprehensive anchor.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (scientific manuscripts/reports with provenance and accountability) and a distinct trigger ('when scientific accuracy and traceability matter') make overlap with unrelated skills minimal, matching the clear-niche anchor.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.