Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured, actionable, and concise, with a clearly sequenced workflow containing validation checkpoints and fail-closed boundaries. Progressive disclosure is exemplary: an overview points to one-level-deep reference files that all exist, with explicit guidance not to load them all.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence with no 'what is CSV' filler; the dated pinned-dependency table and citation block add length but are load-bearing rather than padding, leaving only minor trim opportunities. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands across the workflow (capability_manifest.py inspect, eda_analyzer.py, tabular_profile.py, missingness_leakage_audit.py, etc.) with concrete flags and placeholder identifiers, covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A five-step numbered workflow with explicit validation checkpoints ('Manifest before content analysis', 'If status is reference_only, do not run eda_analyzer.py', 'If unknown, stop') supplies clear sequencing and feedback loops for batch/destructive operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a clear overview with a mapping table to six one-level-deep references (all verified to exist) plus guidance to load only the relevant one, and bundled scripts/assets are appropriately separated with signaled navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |