Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced workflow with strong executable commands and real validation feedback loops. Its weaknesses are token efficiency and progressive disclosure: the body is long and redundant, explains some basic concepts, and duplicates content that already exists in the bundled reference files.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated '### Screening and Selection' header (the section appears twice) and drop or merge the Summary/Best Practices sections, which restate the Core Workflow phases.
Move the inline Citation Style Guide and Database-Specific Search Guidance sections into references/citation_styles.md and references/database_strategies.md, leaving only a one-line pointer plus a quick reference, so the body stops duplicating the bundled references.
Cut basic-concept explanations Claude already knows (e.g., 'Preprints are not peer-reviewed', 'Boolean operators: AND, OR, NOT') to tighten the token budget.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly actionable but padded with redundancy (duplicated '### Screening and Selection' headers, a Summary restating earlier phases, Best Practices overlapping the Core Workflow) and minor over-explanation of concepts Claude knows ('Preprints are not peer-reviewed', 'Boolean operators: AND, OR, NOT'), so it could be tightened rather than earning the lean score-3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands throughout — `parallel-cli search ... --include-domains ...`, `python scripts/verify_citations.py`, `cp assets/review_template.md`, `gget search pubmed ...` — with specific flags and example query strings, matching the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced seven-phase workflow with explicit validation checkpoints — the citation-verification feedback loop ('Correct any errors... Re-run verification until all citations pass') and a final Quality Checklist — satisfying the destructive/batch requirement rather than being capped at 2. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References to bundled files are real and clearly signaled ('Detailed formatting guidelines are in references/citation_styles.md'), but the ~700-line body is monolithic with inline content that should live in those references — the Citation Style Guide and Database-Specific Search Guidance sections duplicate references/citation_styles.md and references/database_strategies.md rather than being appropriately split. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |