Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Well-structured, executable skill body with a clean routing table pointing to real one-level reference files and concrete command examples. Slightly padded by the academic-source-priority section and minor validation gaps for destructive monitor operations.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean routing table and command blocks that assume Claude's competence; the 'Academic source priority' section repeats generic guidance Claude already knows and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands for install, login, status, and polling with concrete flags and version pins, plus a routing table mapping intents to capability files. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Setup, status, and polling steps are sequenced with a hard three-poll limit and explicit stop-and-report checkpoint; the routing decision flow is clear, though destructive monitor state changes lack an explicit validate-before-act loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview routing table signals one-level-deep references to six real capability files (all present in references/), with setup/status/polling kept inline; navigation is explicit and shallow. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |