Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Excellent body content: highly actionable with verified runnable commands and helper modules, a clearly sequenced scientific workflow with embedded validation checkpoints, and a clean progressive-disclosure structure pointing to real, well-scoped reference files. The only minor deduction is for a few trimmable host-specific and procedural passages.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with nonobvious, version-specific knowledge (ArviZ 1 package split, DataTree returns, prob= vs legacy argument names, deprecated nuts_sampler_kwargs) rather than general concepts, but a few parts could be trimmed — notably the host-specific macOS PYTENSOR_FLAGS="cxx=" validation note and the lengthy citation instructions. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully copy-paste-ready pinned uv run commands for two runnable templates and executable Python fragments for the bundled helpers (check_diagnostics, compare_models, check_loo_reliability, model_averaging — all verified present in scripts/), covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An 8-step workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (prior predictive check before fitting; rank R-hat, bulk/tail ESS, MCSE, divergences, BFMI screening; posterior predictive inspection) and explicit error-recovery guidance such as "Fix geometry and initialization before simply increasing draws." | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body acts as a clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references — all five referenced files (standard_workflow.md, workflows.md, model_patterns.md, distributions.md, sampling_inference.md) exist, each introduced with a description of its contents, with scripts and assets appropriately separated. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |