scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.
73
Quality
92%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Securityby
Passed
No findings from the security scan
No security issues found
Scanned
- Repository
- K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
- Commit
757b63b
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.