CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

treatment-plans

Format and structurally validate local treatment-plan documentation after clinical decisions have already been supplied and verified by authorized licensed professionals. Use for source traceability, clinician-authored intervention records, goals and checkpoints, shared-decision records, reconciliation handoffs, and release gates—not for clinical decision-making.

73

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with a clear, validated workflow and excellent progressive disclosure via a verified reference map. The only minor weakness is moderate repetition of safety framing across several boundary sections.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and directive with no padding about concepts Claude already knows, but the safety framing is restated across the Hard safety boundary, Required visible notice, Data gate, and Source boundaries sections; each is scoped to a distinct facet but some tightening would reduce repetition.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready bash commands with explicit flags and paths for template generation, six deterministic validators, timeline generation, and AST/unit verification, covering the common end-to-end cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced five-step workflow holds the release gate "blocked" until review, runs six deterministic validation scripts as an explicit checkpoint, and includes a human-review feedback loop requiring discrepancy resolution before release.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is an overview with a well-signaled one-level-deep Reference map (eight references, each with a one-line description, all verified to exist) and inline asset/script paths, splitting detailed guidance, templates, and CLIs into appropriately separate files.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, complete, and distinctive, clearly stating both the capability and the triggering use cases while carving out a negative boundary. Its only weakness is a slightly limited set of distinct action verbs, with coverage conveyed largely through use-case nouns.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and concrete actions ("Format and structurally validate local treatment-plan documentation") and lists several specific use cases (source traceability, clinician-authored intervention records, goals and checkpoints, shared-decision records, reconciliation handoffs, release gates), but the distinct verb count is limited to format/validate with the rest expressed as nouns, leaving a minor gap versus comprehensive action coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ("Format and structurally validate local treatment-plan documentation after clinical decisions have already been supplied and verified") and when via a concrete "Use for..." trigger clause enumerating specific use cases with a negative boundary ("not for clinical decision-making").

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good coverage of natural domain terms a clinical-informatics user would say ("treatment-plan documentation", "shared-decision records", "reconciliation handoffs", "release gates", "source traceability") plus an explicit negative trigger, but a few common synonyms or phrasings are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (post-decision documentation formatting/validation) with distinct triggers and an explicit "not for clinical decision-making" boundary that minimizes overlap with clinical-decision skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.