Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable safety-critical skill body with a clear sequenced workflow, executable commands, and properly layered references. The only weakness is redundancy in the safety-boundary framing, which inflates token cost without adding clarity.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated safety framing: the 'Hard safety boundary', 'Required visible notice', 'Data gate', and 'Source boundaries' sections restate the same prohibition; merge into a single boundary block and reference it.
Trim the nine-item 'Never use it to' list to the most representative exclusions and point to references/safety_scope.md for the exhaustive set.
Move the full source-ledger citation list (FDA, WHO, NICE, AHRQ, CMS) entirely into references/source_ledger.md and keep only the routing rule inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of generic concept explanation, but the safety message is restated across four sections and the nine-item 'Never use it to' list is verbose even for a safety-critical skill. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, executable commands for generation, validation, and verification (e.g. 'python3 scripts/validate_treatment_plan.py ./local-plan-package') with concrete flags and paths. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced five-step workflow with an explicit deterministic-checks validation step and a release-gate checkpoint that stays blocked until human review completes. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a concise overview with a one-level-deep Reference map; every referenced file under references/ and assets/ exists and is clearly signaled. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |