Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with a clear, validated workflow and excellent progressive disclosure via a verified reference map. The only minor weakness is moderate repetition of safety framing across several boundary sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and directive with no padding about concepts Claude already knows, but the safety framing is restated across the Hard safety boundary, Required visible notice, Data gate, and Source boundaries sections; each is scoped to a distinct facet but some tightening would reduce repetition. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready bash commands with explicit flags and paths for template generation, six deterministic validators, timeline generation, and AST/unit verification, covering the common end-to-end cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced five-step workflow holds the release gate "blocked" until review, runs six deterministic validation scripts as an explicit checkpoint, and includes a human-review feedback loop requiring discrepancy resolution before release. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview with a well-signaled one-level-deep Reference map (eight references, each with a one-line description, all verified to exist) and inline asset/script paths, splitting detailed guidance, templates, and CLIs into appropriately separate files. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |