Conciseness

Mostly efficient, but the second full 'no projects found' JSON example re-lists ~10 fields already shown, and the Tech Stack Detection table ('Look for mentions of: Languages | JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, Go, Rust') restates taxonomy Claude already knows; the full report template is also trimmable. This fits 'includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' rather than the 4 anchor's 'minor instances of over-explanation'.

Actionability

Provides an executable command ('find . -name "*.srt" -type f | grep -v "CODE/" | sort'), exact progress.json and project-findings.json structures, concrete field tables, explicit start/continue/end/skip heuristics with example phrases, and a naming pattern ('Project_[Framework][CoreFeature][Distinguisher]'). Guidance is copy-paste ready and covers the common cases, matching the 5 anchor; there are no material gaps that would justify 4.

Workflow Clarity

The six steps are clearly sequenced with restart/idempotency handling ('Previous run was interrupted. Clean up any partial CODE/__CC_Projects/ folder and restart'), but there is no output validation — nothing verifies that every SRT file lands in either a project's source_srts or skipped_srts before reporting completion. Per the rubric guideline, a batch operation without validation/verification is capped at 3; it is not 2 because the sequence and steps are well defined, not 'poorly defined'.

Progressive Disclosure

The 'Reference Files' section clearly signals two one-level-deep references ('discovery-patterns.md - Detailed patterns for identifying projects', 'manifest-schema.md - Complete JSON schema for project-findings.json'), both of which exist in the bundle and contain the promised detail. However, the ~50-line inline manifest JSON example partially duplicates manifest-schema.md, a minor organization gap that keeps it below the 5 anchor's 'content appropriately split'; it is above 3 because the bulk of detailed material (patterns, full schema) is properly deferred to references.

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions with the file type: 'Analyze course transcript files (.srt)', 'scan a course folder and identify what hands-on projects are taught', 'Outputs a manifest file', plus the explicit boundary 'without generating any code'. Coverage of the skill's capability surface is complete, matching the 5 anchor; it is not 4 because no meaningful actions are missing.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both questions: what ('Analyze course transcript files (.srt) to discover teachable projects... Outputs a manifest file') and when ('Use when you need to scan a course folder...', 'Triggers on phrases like...'). This matches the 5 anchor's 'clearly and explicitly answers both what AND when with concrete trigger phrases'; not 4 because the when-clause is fully explicit rather than merely present.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural trigger phrases users would actually say: 'discover projects', 'analyze course', 'find projects in transcripts', 'what projects are in this course', plus the '.srt' file extension — covering synonyms, a question form, and an extension as in the 5 anchor. Not 4, since no common variations are conspicuously absent.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche (course transcript project discovery producing a manifest, explicitly 'without generating any code') is clearly distinct from a companion generation skill, but the trigger 'analyze course' is broad enough that a user meaning some other course analysis could invoke it — fitting the 4 anchor's 'minor overlap risk'. Not 5 because that trigger does not guarantee minimal conflict risk; not 3 because the .srt/manifest domain is far more specific than generic 'works with document files'.