Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, highly actionable routing reference whose commands and routing table are concrete and verified against the real script. The main weakness is the absence of validation and error-path guidance (unknown types, low confidence, batch failures), which caps workflow clarity, plus a minor command-path inconsistency and some duplicated flag documentation.
Suggestions
Add validation guidance to the Pipeline Integration workflow: what to do when the router returns an unknown type, a low-confidence (extension-only) result, or a processor skill that does not exist before invoking step 3 — this also lifts the batch-operation cap on workflow clarity.
Fix the path inconsistency in Pipeline Integration ('python file_router.py input.file --json' vs 'python scripts/file_router.py') so every command is copy-paste ready.
Consolidate the flag documentation duplicated between Quick Start and CLI Reference (e.g., drop flag explanations from Quick Start) to trim tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no concept explanations Claude already knows ('Quick Start', 'Routing Table', 'Detection Priority' are all tables or commands), but Quick Start and CLI Reference duplicate the same flags (--json, --dir, --list-types) and the human-readable output example partially repeats the JSON example. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are concrete and executable ('python scripts/file_router.py path/to/file --json') and the referenced script exists with a matching CLI, but Pipeline Integration uses 'python file_router.py input.file --json' without the 'scripts/' prefix used elsewhere, so that exact line is not copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear (route → jq-extract processor → invoke; detection priority 1-3) but no validation checkpoints exist: nothing on handling unknown/unrecognized file types, low-confidence extension-only results, or verifying batch (--dir/--recursive) output, and the rubric caps batch-operation workflows without validation at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with the single bundle file scripts/file_router.py existing and correctly referenced; all inline content (quick start, routing table, CLI reference) is appropriately placed at this size, so the structure matches the well-organized simple-skill case. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |