Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable router skill: every command is executable and the multi-step workflow is clearly sequenced with decision outcomes mapped to actions. The only weaknesses are mild redundancy in how the routing decision is presented and the absence of explicit input-validation checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but the decision logic is rendered three ways (ASCII "Decision Flow" diagram, "Routing Table", and "Decision Types" table), which is minor redundancy that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | All guidance is copy-paste ready: "python scripts/db_route.py --json '{...}'", "--file database.db", "--list-routes", plus a full CLI reference and an executable Agent Workflow covering the common cases (route from identification JSON, identify+route in one step). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Agent Workflow gives a clear 3-step sequence (identify → route → execute) with explicit commands and per-decision actions, and "unknown_format → Manual investigation" provides an escape path; however there are no explicit validation checkpoints on the identification input (e.g., handling malformed JSON), keeping it below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with a single correctly-referenced bundle file (scripts/db_route.py, which exists); no nested or buried references. Minor gap: the inline Routing Table duplicates what "--list-routes" prints, and path references are inconsistent ("scripts/db_route.py" vs "db-router/scripts/db_route.py"). | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |