Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-sequenced debugging workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops, appropriately concise for a process skill. The only gap is the absence of concrete code or commands, which is acceptable for an instruction-only skill but keeps actionability at 4.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean ~8-line workflow with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line instructs an action, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps give concrete, specific guidance ("Record input, expected result, actual result, and environment", "Research authoritative sources for 3–5 plausible fixes") but, being a process skill, include no copy-paste code or commands; this sits at mostly-executable rather than fully-executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five numbered steps form a clear sequence with explicit validation ("Re-run the original reproduction and applicable checks") and a feedback loop ("After two failed attempts at the same error, stop speculative edits"), matching the explicit-checkpoints anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, well-organized into numbered steps, with a single one-level reference to `../vibe-verify/SKILL.md`; per the simple-skill guideline this scores 5 with well-organized sections and no nested references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |