Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written, well-structured research-workflow skill: lean, highly actionable, with a clear step sequence and an explicit confirmation checkpoint. Its only structural caveat is reliance on an external (non-bundled) question-bank file, which it handles gracefully.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean workflow script that assumes Claude's competence and teaches no background concepts; the inline templates (verification echo, Handoff Context block) earn their tokens. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific: an exact output path (docs/research-[AppName].md), exact section headings, an exact Handoff Context block, and per-level question paths — fully actionable despite being instruction-only. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced Step 1→4 process with an explicit validation checkpoint in Step 3 ('Is this accurate? Should I adjust anything?') before proceeding to the research phase. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-organized overview with a single, clearly signaled one-level-deep reference (part1-deepresearch.md as the 'single source of truth'), with graceful handling of its absence and no nested references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |