Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured process skill: it defines a concrete reporting framework, covers fallback behavior when tooling is unavailable, and sets clear safety limits, all without padding. Its only real gaps are the absence of an example evidence report and unnumbered workflow steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no concepts are re-explained and nearly every sentence adds operational guidance. It sits just below anchor 5 because of minor trims available (the screenshot caution appears in two nearby sentences), matching anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete process guidance throughout: a named three-status report (Setup/Build/Behavior checked) with what to record for each, an explicit fallback labeled "Not checked", and clear safety boundaries. It falls short of anchor 5's copy-paste-ready standard only in that no example evidence report is shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence runs from reading acceptance criteria, through identifying applicable checks, to exercising the journey and reporting three statuses, with recording requirements acting as checkpoints. It matches anchor 4 rather than 5 because the steps are not explicitly numbered and error-recovery loops are only implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references (none exist in the bundle), and is organized into coherent labeled sections and bullets. Per the rubric's simple-skill provision, this earns a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |