Content
76%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and highly actionable, with concrete state-detection logic and copy-ready prompts. Its main weakness is workflow clarity: the build phase and phase transitions lack explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops, which the rubric caps at 2.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation/verification checkpoints between phases — e.g., after Research confirm the research doc has the required sections before advancing to PRD, and after Build require that the MVP runs and tests pass before declaring launch.
Add a build-phase feedback loop (run -> verify -> fix -> re-verify) since building real code is a batch/destructive-style operation that the rubric expects to have error-recovery steps.
Factor the repeated per-phase 'Progress Check / Next Step' prompt blocks into a single parameterized template to reduce inline verbosity and tighten conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean orchestrator guidance (tables, terse rules, copy-ready prompts) that assumes Claude's competence, but the repeated per-phase 'Progress Check / Next Step' blocks and the closing motivational quote ('The best time to build was yesterday...') add verbosity that keeps it just below a clean 3. | 2.5 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, copy-ready guidance: a file-existence decision table mapping docs to workflow state, exact quoted prompts per state, and a quick-commands table — actionable instruction without vague direction or pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step pipeline is explicitly sequenced with an ASCII diagram, time budgets, and progress checkboxes, but there are no validation/verification checkpoints between phases and no feedback loop for the build phase, so per the rubric workflow clarity is capped at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with no bundle references and clear section headers plus a command table, but the repeated per-phase prompt templates are inline content that a more progressively-disclosed design would factor out, placing it between levels 2 and 3. | 2.5 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |