Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured routing skill with concrete guidance and clear branching plus checkpoint-style reporting; its only soft spot is a few high-level directives that could be made fully prescriptive and explicit validation loops on the build path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense throughout: every line is procedural routing/state guidance with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout (named sibling skills, a directly reusable routing question, and named handoff fields), with minor gaps where some directives like 'choose one bounded change' lack explicit selection criteria. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear three-way branching with a retained five-step sequence for new projects and a reporting schema that acts as checkpoints; minor gaps because explicit validate→fix→retry loops are not drawn out on the build path. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with clear one-level-deep routing to sibling skill files (vibe-change, vibe-debug) and no nested references; for a short single-purpose skill this is appropriately structured and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |