Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, well-structured router that assumes Claude's intelligence and gives concrete, branched guidance with verification emphasis. It earns top marks for conciseness and structure, with only minor gaps in executable specificity and explicit error-recovery loops.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive with no concept re-explanation or padding; every line carries a specific instruction (e.g. "Load only the context needed", "An existing file does not prove that a stage is complete"), assuming Claude's competence throughout. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and mostly executable, naming specific skills and sequenced actions ("Use `vibe-agents` when creating project instructions, `vibe-build` for a new implementation", "reproduce, diagnose, fix, and verify the failure"), with a minor gap being its dependence on skills that may not be present in the target environment. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Branching scenarios (New product / Existing product / Broken behavior / Handoff) give a clear sequence with verification checkpoints ("verify the failure", "distinguish actual results from unperformed checks"), but explicit error-recovery feedback loops and checklists for the riskier branches are not fully spelled out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references and is well-organized into clearly signaled scenario sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |