Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, well-structured, and actionable with concrete file paths, grep targets, and a verification command. The main gaps are a missing code example of the guards to remove and an incomplete fix-and-retry feedback loop in verification.
Suggestions
Add a short code snippet showing an example managed-template guard (e.g. an `isManagedTemplateTrialUser` check) and what removing it looks like, so the action is copy-paste concrete rather than described.
Extend the Verification section with an explicit feedback loop: if `bun run ci` fails on a test your changes touched, fix the edit and re-run until green, in addition to separating out pre-existing failures.
Clarify step 3's branch ('Delete ... if it becomes unused; otherwise simplify') with a one-line check for how to determine unused (e.g. grep for remaining importers) so the decision is mechanical.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient: no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, just the single useful fact ('This repo uses Bun') plus concrete file paths, identifiers, and directives. Every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable guidance — exact files to read, identifiers/strings to grep, six numbered changes, and a concrete verification command (`bun run ci`) — but as an instruction-only skill it includes no example of the actual guard code to remove, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Inspect → Required changes → Verification → Output sequence with a validation checkpoint (`bun run ci`), but the error-recovery loop only addresses pre-existing failures ('say that clearly and separate it') without an explicit fix-and-re-run step for failures introduced by the edits. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, organized into clearly headed sections (Goal, Inspect first, Required changes, Verification, Output); per the simple-skills note this earns a 5 on structure alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |