Content
37%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a vacuous stub: a title plus one sentence that restates it. It contains no actionable guidance and no workflow, though it also commits no structural or token-efficiency sins. Progressive disclosure is trivially satisfied only because there is no content to disclose.
Suggestions
State the skill's actual purpose and the concrete actions to perform (e.g. specific commands, code, or decision rules) instead of the sentence "This is the second calendar skill."
If the skill involves a multi-step or destructive/batch operation, sequence the steps explicitly and include a validation checkpoint before proceeding.
Remove the redundant body sentence that repeats the H1 title, or replace it with the first real instruction.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The two-line body has no padding or over-explanation, but "This is the second calendar skill." merely restates the header "# Calendar (Second)" — a minor redundancy that could be trimmed, matching anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | "This is the second calendar skill." only describes (barely) and provides no code, commands, or concrete steps — matching anchor 1 ("only describes rather than instructs"). | 1 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | No steps or sequence of any kind appear; the simple-skill exception requires an unambiguous single action, and none is stated, so anchor 1 ("steps missing") applies. | 1 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, has no bundle files, no nested or buried references, and nothing that belongs in a separate file — per the rubric's simple-skill guideline this trivially satisfies the dimension. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 11 / 20 Passed |