Content
22%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a minimal stub with one heading and a single descriptive sentence, providing no actionable guidance, workflow, or meaningful structure. It avoids verbosity but also delivers no usable content.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable guidance for what the skill actually does (e.g., a command or snippet that checks frontmatter fields).
If the skill has a multi-step process, lay out the steps with explicit validation checkpoints.
Replace the descriptive filler line with content that earns its place in the context window.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is very short with no padding, but the two lines ('This skill has non-standard frontmatter fields.') add nothing Claude doesn't already know, so it is efficient in length yet hollow rather than truly lean and value-adding. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | There is no code, command, or concrete instruction — the body only describes a fact, matching the entirely-vague/abstract anchor. | 1 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | No steps or sequence are present; the body is a single non-action statement, matching the steps-missing anchor. | 1 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and there is no nesting or buried-reference anti-pattern, but the single heading and one-line body offer only minimal structure rather than well-organized sections, so it sits in the middle. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 8 / 20 Passed |