Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable reference with executable examples for every parameter and a clear cache-first workflow. The one material gap is the destructive `clear` operation: it documents the unscoped-wipe guardrail but provides no preview/verify-before-clear step, which caps workflow clarity under the rubric.
Suggestions
Add a preview-then-clear workflow: run the same query/url_pattern with `clear` omitted to review matching entries, then re-run with `clear: true` only after confirming the match set.
Show the expected output shape of `check_changes: true` (changed/unchanged counts + per-URL diff) so the agent can verify the re-fetch actually completed rather than silently failing.
In the Anti-Patterns section, replace the single guardrail sentence with an explicit two-step sequence (verify filter → clear) so the destructive path has a validation checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean throughout: a JSON quick reference, a compact parameter table, and short sections — every token earns its place. The brief cost framing ('A miss costs nothing; a redundant fetch wastes 5-15 seconds') justifies the workflow rather than padding it. Not below 5 because nothing explains concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable copy-paste JSON examples covering every common case (keyword, scoped, hybrid, since-filter, stats, check_changes, clear), plus a parameter table with types and defaults and a concrete cache-then-fallback workflow. Matches the 5 anchor's 'specific examples cover the common cases'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The cache-first workflow is well sequenced (probe → miss → fall through), but `clear: true` is a destructive operation and the body only notes the handler-side guardrail ('the handler refuses an unscoped wipe') with no verification step such as previewing matches before clearing. Per the rubric, missing validation in a destructive workflow caps this at 3; it is not 2 because the primary workflow's sequence and fallback are clearly defined. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained SKILL.md (~80 lines) with well-organized sections and no bundle files to disclose; the See Also links to sibling skills are one level deep and clearly signaled. Content is appropriately sized for the overview with no material that belongs in a separate file. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |